tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8881340.post4807419931677934009..comments2024-03-22T20:17:41.934+11:00Comments on Horse - The Blog That Promises Nothing And Delivers Even Less: Horse 1037 - Structural Separation of TelstraRollohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09857022259613895393noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8881340.post-81500355820443021502009-09-22T11:48:09.307+10:002009-09-22T11:48:09.307+10:00Success never has to do with what a company does.
...Success never has to do with what a company does.<br />As contained within the post, success for a company is determined by how much profit it generates, not by what it actually does. In that respect, Telstra is a highly successful company. I asked "why" and what are the ethics of that success?<br /><br />The Government's concern is what is best for the people, not by how profitable a company is.Rollohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09857022259613895393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8881340.post-25932273205565472652009-09-21T18:10:06.728+10:002009-09-21T18:10:06.728+10:00I'm not gonna add more comments here - you alr...I'm not gonna add more comments here - you already know my thoughts on everything.<br /><br />I'm simply going to point out that only PART of Telstra's product range is Australia-wide infrastructure that it has to wholesale.<br /><br />Their mobile network and their IP backbone are all their own creation and work, and there's plenty of competition out there for those if consumers want. Yet more than 50% of customers who have a private IP network have it with Telstra. And Telstra has the highest market share in the 3G mobile world.<br /><br />So would you call that success then, Rollo, seeing as it's got nothing to do with Australia's copper network?Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01456124395941072901noreply@blogger.com